By the AI Strategy Team at Matrix AI Consulting.
In our experience working with leadership teams across multiple sectors—from financial services to civil construction and tourism—the most expensive AI mistake businesses make is simple: confusing different types of AI capabilities and investing in the wrong one.
There’s no shortage of hype in the market. But while everyone’s talking about ChatGPT or “intelligent agents,” few decision-makers are asking the most important question:
What type of intelligence does our business actually need to solve this problem?
We believe the difference between automation, generative AI (GenAI), and agentic AI is not just academic—it’s strategic and commercial. Understanding these differences is critical to avoid misaligned projects, wasted investment, and tools that don’t scale.
We’ve seen firsthand how organisations fall into three common traps:
The confusion is understandable. AI is evolving rapidly, and vendors are quick to brand any system with logic as “AI.” But from our perspective, clarity on these three categories is the single most important factor in building a successful
AI roadmap.
Here’s how we guide clients through the distinction:
What it does: Executes repetitive, rules-based tasks with speed and consistency. Think logic trees, structured workflows, and predictable outcomes.
When to use it: You know the rules, the outcomes, and the exceptions.
Example use cases:
What it does: Generates new content—text, code, images, even strategy documents—based on patterns learned from massive datasets.
When to use it: You need to draft, summarise, or create something that typically requires a skilled human.
Example use cases:
What it does: Performs complex, multi-step tasks across systems—without needing step-by-step prompts. Agentic AI plans, acts, and adapts to achieve a goal.
When to use it: You want an AI assistant that learns from outcomes and acts on your behalf across different tools or channels.
Example use cases:
We recently advised a national firm looking to modernise their recruitment process. Like many others, they were exploring generative AI to “streamline hiring.” We proposed a structured approach, combining all three AI layers—each playing a specific role:
Capability | Application | Impact |
---|---|---|
Automation | CV filtering, interview scheduling | Reduced admin time by 65% |
GenAI | Job ad creation, candidate communications | 3x faster campaign launches |
Agentic AI | AI agent managing multichannel candidate flow | 28% increase in high-quality applicants |
Instead of chasing a single “AI silver bullet,” the organisation now runs a modular, scalable hiring engine—designed to evolve as new capabilities mature.
According to McKinsey’s 2023 Global AI Survey, 55% of companies now use AI in at least one business function. But only 23% of executives say their AI efforts have led to significant bottom-line impact [1].
We believe the gap lies in misalignment—deploying intelligence that’s either overengineered or underpowered for the task at hand.
Similarly, IBM’s 2024 Efficiency Benchmark found that organisations using a blend of automation, GenAI, and agentic AI outperformed single-tech adopters by 35% in operational ROI [2]. The key? Choosing the right mix for the right maturity stage.
When we advise clients on AI strategy, we use a simple litmus test: “If the outcome is known and repeatable—automate it. If it’s creative or interpretive—use GenAI. If it’s multi-step, adaptive, and cross-system—consider agentic AI.”
This approach helps ensure your AI stack reflects your business, not just the tech trends.
Too many businesses start with a tool and work backward. At Matrix AI, we help clients start with purpose, process, and people—then choose the right tool to match.
We’re not here to sell hype. We’re here to help New Zealand and Australian businesses build long-term value through practical, future-proof AI solutions. Whether you're automating tasks, exploring GenAI for productivity, or testing agentic tools for the next leap—the smartest investment you can make is in clarity.
Before you spend time or budget on the wrong AI solution, book a conversation with our team using the contact us button below.
[1] McKinsey & Company. (2023). The State of AI in 2023: Generative AI’s breakout year. https://www.mckinsey.com
[2] IBM Institute for Business Value. (2024). AI and Automation: The 2024 Efficiency Benchmark Report.
https://www.ibm.com